Week 44, 2026Published October 22, 2026

AI Model Power Rankings

The cheap seats fill up: DeepSeek and MiniMax undercut everyone, Opus 5.5 holds. No new frontier model this week. The action was at the bottom of the price list. DeepSeek's October 17 snapshot of V4.1 Flash matches GLM-5.3 on the independent Artificial Analysis index with MIT-licensed weights, and MiniMax's M3.1 Flash landed two days later at $0.15 / $0.60. Up top, Claude Opus 5.5 keeps #1, and Anthropic built its new Claude Duet agent on it.

RiserDeepSeek V4.1 Flash

New at #2 in Best Value and #2 in Open-Weight Watch. The 1017 snapshot scores 45 on the Artificial Analysis index, level with GLM-5.3, at about $0.26 per index task, with MIT-licensed weights you can download.

FallerGemini 3.8 Flash

Down from #2 to #5 in Best Value. Artificial Analysis puts it at about $1.24 per index task, against $0.22–0.28 for the new Chinese Flash models, and its price doubles in January.

01Power Rankings

The best general-purpose AI models right now, with quality, price and momentum rolled into one score.

#Movement±ModelPrice / 1M tokensScore
1 — Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic

Still 58 on the Artificial Analysis index and #1 on Arena WebDev. Anthropic chose it to run Claude Duet, its new always-on agent.

$4 in / $20 out 97
2 — Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle

Still #1 on Arena text, with a preliminary 1524. A quiet first full week on sale. Budget for $4 / $20 from December 1.

$2 in / $10 out 95
3 — Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic

Still 56 on the Artificial Analysis index, three points clear of Argon at the same $2 / $10.

$2 in / $10 out 94
4 — GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI

No change. Still the best value in OpenAI's lineup and the default in Codex.

$2 in / $10 out 93
5 — Muse WonderMeta

Holds #2 on Arena text in its second week, but 52 on the Artificial Analysis index is still six behind Opus 5.5 at the same price.

$4 in / $20 out 91
6 — Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic

Nothing new. Still a specialist pick for the hardest problems at 2.5x Opus 5.5's price.

$10 in / $50 out 90
7 — GPT-6 AstraOpenAI

GPT-6 Pro in ChatGPT now splits a task across parallel agents. That's useful, but it's Pro-only and OpenAI published no numbers to judge it by.

$10 in / $50 out 88
8 — Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic

New $0.15 models arrived this week. At $0.10 / $0.50 it's still the cheapest of the strong small models.

$0.1 in / $0.5 out 88
9 — Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle

Still good, but the new Chinese Flash models now cost a fifth as much per independent index task, and its January price rise is coming.

$0.75 in / $3.75 out 86
10 NEW DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · open

New entry. The 1017 snapshot ties GLM-5.3 at 45 on the Artificial Analysis index, at a lower hosted price and under an MIT license.

$0.3 in / $1.20 out 86
11 ▼1 Kimi K3Moonshot AI

Now edged by DeepSeek's cheaper Flash on the Artificial Analysis index, 45 to 44. Still a favourite for agent work.

Not published 85
12 ▼1 GLM-5.3Z.ai · open

Now shares the open-weight top score of 45 with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, and still has the deeper Arena vote record.

Not published 84

02Coding

For developers and 'vibe coders': writing, fixing and shipping real software.

#Movement±ModelPrice / 1M tokensScore
1 — Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic

Still #1 on Arena WebDev. Nothing new this week threatened it.

$4 in / $20 out 98
2 — Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic

Top four on WebDev at half Opus 5.5's price. Still the pick for well-scoped fixes.

$2 in / $10 out 94
3 — GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI

OpenAI says Codex sub-agents can now reuse context and keep it cached for longer, which should cut repeat costs on long jobs.

$2 in / $10 out 93
4 — GPT-6 AstraOpenAI

Still #2 on WebDev. Sol does most of the same work for a fifth of the price.

$10 in / $50 out 91
5 — Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic

Excellent code, but two cheaper Anthropic models do most jobs as well.

$10 in / $50 out 90
6 — Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle

Still outside the WebDev top five. Early reviews rate its writing above its coding.

$2 in / $10 out 88
7 — Muse WonderMeta

A quiet second week. Still mid-table on WebDev at Opus 5.5's price.

$4 in / $20 out 85
8 — Kimi K3Moonshot AI

Still a popular cheap coding agent. DeepSeek and MiniMax have both entered WebDev, so check back next week to see where they land.

Not published 84
9 — GLM-5.3Z.ai · open

Still the open-weight coding pick until the new WebDev entries have enough votes.

Not published 83
10 — Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic

Independent Terminal-Bench runs in the mid-30s. Plenty for cheap sub-agents.

$0.1 in / $0.5 out 81

03Best Value

The most capability per dollar. If you're building an app or watching a budget, start here.

#Movement±ModelPrice / 1M tokensScore
1 — Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic

$0.10 / $0.50 under 100K tokens and 43 on the Artificial Analysis index at max effort. Still #1, though the gap is now small.

$0.1 in / $0.5 out 95
2 NEW DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · open

New. A 45 on the index for about $0.26 per task. It's half price off-peak, but $0.30 / $1.20 in peak hours.

$0.3 in / $1.20 out 93
3 — Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle

Near the top of the index at $2 / $10 until December, with Batch at half that.

$2 in / $10 out 92
4 — GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI

Near-Astra coding at $2 / $10, with cached input at $0.10.

$2 in / $10 out 92
5 ▼3 Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle

Down three places. About $1.24 per Artificial Analysis index task is now hard to defend, and the price doubles in January.

$0.75 in / $3.75 out 89
6 ▼1 Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic

The highest index score at $2 / $10, but it uses lots of tokens, which eats into the savings.

$2 in / $10 out 89
7 NEW MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax

New. The cheapest per index task this week at about $0.22, but with a 93% hallucination rate, so don't use it where you can't check every answer.

$0.15 in / $0.6 out 87
8 ▼2 GPT-6 LunaOpenAI

Same price as Haiku 5.5 with weaker independent results, and now cheaper rivals from China too.

$0.1 in / $0.5 out 86
9 ▼2 Muse Spark 1.3Meta

Strong conversation at $1.25 / $4.25.

$1.25 in / $4.25 out 85
10 ▼2 Qwen3.8-FlashAlibaba

$0.15 / $0.47 with good multilingual skills, but DeepSeek and MiniMax now charge about the same.

$0.15 in / $0.47 out 84
11 ▼2 Mercury 2.5Inception

Very fast diffusion text generation at $0.20 / $0.75.

$0.2 in / $0.75 out 79

04Open-Weight Watch

Models you can download, run privately and customise.

#Movement±ModelPrice / 1M tokensScore
1 — GLM-5.3Z.ai · open

Now tied with DeepSeek at 45 on the Artificial Analysis index. It keeps #1 on its Arena record and its cheap Flash sibling.

Not published 91
2 NEW DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · open

New. The October 17 snapshot matches GLM-5.3 on the index and ships under MIT, a cleaner license than GLM's own.

$0.3 in / $1.20 out 90
3 ▼1 MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi · open

Level with GLM-5.3 on Arena, on fewer votes. Another quiet week.

Not published 88
4 ▼1 Muse Spark OpenMeta · open

Still the strongest US open-weight model at 39 on the index. Reflection's Beam arrived behind it.

Not published 85
5 NEW Beam 1.0Reflection AI · open

New. Apache 2.0 weights and published training recipes, but 30 on the index puts it well behind the leaders. There's no hosted API yet.

Not published 80
6 ▼2 Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrismML · open

Still the one on this list that runs on hardware you might own. See our guide to running AI on your own computer.

Not published 78

05Image Generation

Making pictures from text, based on LMArena text-to-image votes plus our hands-on notes.

#Movement±ModelPrice / 1M tokensScore
1 — GPT Image 2.5OpenAI

No new text-to-image entries on Arena this week. Still the clear leader.

— 97
2 — MAI-Image 2.6Microsoft AI

Still just ahead of Google's newest.

— 88
3 — Nano Banana 2.1Google

Still top five at about half Nano Banana 2's price.

— 87
4 — Reve 2.1Reve

Still the indie favourite for aesthetics.

— 85
5 — Grok Imagine Image 2.0xAI

Still top-tier on its low setting.

— 83
6 — Seedream 5.0 ProByteDance

Powers the CapCut/Dreamina creator ecosystem.

— 80

06Video Generation

Text-to-video, and what to use now that Sora is gone.

#Movement±ModelPrice / 1M tokensScore
1 — Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGoogle

Another quiet week for video. Google holds the top of the board.

— 95
2 — Veo 3.1Google

The safest all-rounder, with native audio and 4K.

— 92
3 — FLUX 3 VideoBlack Forest Labs

Holds #3, still on a small vote count.

— 90
4 — Kling 3.0Kuaishou

The value king at about 11–14 cents per second, plus storyboard mode.

— 89
5 — Grok Imagine Video 1.5xAI

Top five in agent mode. Fast and fun.

— 87
6 — Seedance 2.5ByteDance

Still the best realistic human motion for creators.

— 86
7 — Wan 3.0Alibaba

Still the tinkerer's pick for custom pipelines.

— 84
8 — Runway Gen-4.5Runway

Professionals still choose it for camera control.

— 82

The Wire · what happened this week

  1. Anthropic previews Claude Duet, an always-on agent that sends a morning brief and watches your connected apps. It runs on Opus 5.5, asks before it sends, pays or deletes anything, and is waitlist-only for US Pro and Max subscribers.

  2. MiniMax launches M3.1 Flash at $0.15 / $0.60. Artificial Analysis scores it 42, but it also measured a 93% hallucination rate: the model guesses rather than admitting it doesn't know. Weights are promised for October 23.

  3. DeepSeek posts a new V4.1 Flash snapshot, 1017, with weights on Hugging Face under MIT. It scores 45 on the Artificial Analysis index, level with GLM-5.3, and joined Arena's WebDev board on October 18.

  4. Reflection AI releases the weights of Beam 1.0, a 501B mixture-of-experts with 23B active, under Apache 2.0. Artificial Analysis scores it 30, second among US open models behind Muse Spark Open.

  5. OpenAI adds parallel agents to GPT-6 Pro in ChatGPT, so several agents can work on parts of one task at once. It's rolling out to Pro subscribers. OpenAI hasn't said how many agents run at once or how fast it is.

  6. Anthropic commits part of its shares to a new Anthropic Public Benefit Fund. Financial press put the stake at 5% and report the company could list on the stock market as soon as November.

  7. Still waiting: Mistral Large 4's open weights are due by the end of October (several outlets say October 27). The license still isn't published.

Scores are our editorial blend of public leaderboards (LMArena, Artificial Analysis and published benchmarks), price and hands-on use. Read the methodology →